Year | Number of Ponds | Area – Average (sq meters) | Area – Median (sq meters) |
---|---|---|---|
2005
|
11
|
608.9
|
344.9
|
2008
|
237
|
1,040.9
|
558.8
|
2010
|
581
|
3,416.9
|
2,001.6
|
2013
|
529
|
7,552.8
|
6,209.7
|
In 2005 the shale revolution was just beginning, and so there were very few ponds near permitted drilling sites. As you can see, as drilling ramped up the ponds got larger. “As of 2013, the total impoundment surface area measures nearly four million square meters, scattered across (Pennsylvania). (New York’s Central Park measures 3.4 million square meters.) ” These were not all the same ponds — of the 581 ponds identified in 2010, only 116 were still there in 2013.
- Schwartz and his colleagues then partnered with the Pennsylvania-based Geisinger Health System to “comb through the medical records of more than 400,000 patients across the state. They’re looking for any correlation between fracking sites and increased respiratory and neonatal health problems. Between the patient demographic information that exists in the electronic health records and the satellite location of the identified waste water ponds, they’ll be able to determine the exact distance between each patient and a drilling site. Geisinger had previously announced a plan to use their own 10-year database of electronic health records to map health trends before and during drilling. The database includes more than 2.6 million residents in a region that has some of the highest concentrations of fracking wells in the United States
The next step will be to analyze the prevalence of individual diseases by distance from drilling sites. This will take several months, but at the end we should have some very good data about the health impacts of drilling on people living close to drilling sites.
The beauty of this is that the oil and gas industry has depended for years on keeping secrets. They come into a community and rely on spreading fear, uncertainty and doubt. They purchase loyalty and silence, and work to encode this in the law. One of their tools is secrecy about well locations, which is a barrier to research.
In the Information Age, it is harder and harder to do that. In Pennsylvania the combination of technology, science, collaboration and citizen activism is breaking the code of silence. The more we know about the real dangers of oil and gas drilling, the more we can do what’s best for our communities.
More…
Click here for an interactive map of impoundments related to shale gas drilling in Pennsylvania, as identified by SkyTruth staff and volunteers on USDA aerial survey photography from 2005, 2008, 2010 and 2013.
http://www.greatfallstribune.com/story/news/local/2014/11/17/early-tests-find-tainted-water-oil-boom/19196551/
Story by Matt Brown indicates ‘Feds’ didn’t seem to find some contamination BUT they didn’t check bad casings and ‘other’ discrepancies. If ya’ll happy with that assessment I be very, very concerned about who we trust.
There are different types of water contamination caused by oil and gas drilling. This study looked at only groundwater contamination, the kind they experienced in Pavillion, Wyoming. There are very few documented cases of this kind of contamination.
However, as the story says, they didn’t look at water contamination from surface spills or faulty casings. These are much more common, and are the inevitable outcome of drilling. This is how water wells get contaminated.
There are many examples of this kind of contamination in the Bakken and elsewhere.
fascinating. Is there any comparable study planned near the Bakken? Thanks for your good work.
Don’t know. I’m trying to set up an interview with the principal researcher in the Pennsylvania study to see what he knows about the research landscape.
Pingback: New study: Women living near fracked wells have increased likelihood of high-risk pregnancies, pre-term births | Preserve the Beartooth Front