For over a decade, oil and gas executives and the policy makers who support them have repeated a single bold claim: there has never been a single documented case where fracking contaminated groundwater. Well, if you repeat a lie often enough you can hope that it becomes the truth, but in the case of fracking the facts are impossible to ignore, and they tell a very different story.
As with many lies, there’s a kernel of truth inside. What the oil and gas execs are doing is telling a very narrow story. We’ve discussed it before — if you define contamination narrowly and after the fact, it’s a very difficult thing to prove. The scientific standard is burdensome, and it’s often hard to reconstruct exactly how contamination occurred. Proving contamination requires knowing the source of the water, the pathway it has taken, and where it was received. And then there’s politics, which often gets in the way of any rational discussion. In Pavillion, Wyoming, for example, local residents have had their water supply permanently contaminated, and they’re left in limbo while politicians argue over a variety of extraneous matters.
But in many ways this discussion is extraneous. Water gets contaminated in a number of ways during the fracking process, and there are many, many examples of this happening. You can’t define away the problem. It’s real. It happens, and it destroys not only water supplies, but people’s lives.
Four ways hydraulic fracturing can cause water contamination
Now we have a new study that shows that risks to water resources from hydraulic fracturing through four major routes, according to Duke scientists Avner Vengosh, Robert Jackson and colleagues at Duke University. The study was published in the journal Environmental Science and Technology last month, and is a review of the scientists’ existing research.
The study found that water contamination due to oil and gas drilling can occur in four primary ways:
- Stray methane from formations could leak from improperly constructed wells into shallow aquifers.
- Wastewater from shale gas drilling could spill at the surface or could be improperly disposed of in streams and rivers.
- Metals or radioactive elements can collect in rivers and streams where partially treated wastewater effluent is released.
- Freshwater withdrawals for fracking can stress groundwater availability in drought-prone regions.
According to EnergyWire (July 10, 2012, subscription required), other studies have challenged the Duke findings, saying migration might have been naturally occurring if the topography of the region allowed it. But the Duke scientists showed statistically that topography could not be the only reason to have contamination in northeastern Pennsylvania.
Let’s deal with it
As with many other issues, it’s time to stop using science to create a political wedge against responsible behavior. We need to accept that fracking causing environmental harm, and develop policy accordingly.
Pingback: Baker Hughes to disclose all fracking chemicals. Don’t get too excited. | Preserve the Beartooth Front
Pingback: Unknown unknowns: the disturbing case of Vernal, Utah | Preserve the Beartooth Front
Pingback: Meeting today in Red Lodge! Frequently Asked Questions about the Silvertip citizen-initiated zone | Preserve the Beartooth Front
Pingback: Oil and gas: 10 lessons for 2015 | Preserve the Beartooth Front