Mortgage lenders increasingly worried about fracking

fracking-mortgage2Yesterday we looked at the clear evidence that fracking in a community causes property to lose significant value. Today we turn our attention to documenting how the mortgage industry, recognizing how drilling adds risk and reduces value, is beginning to tighten policies on lending on properties that have wells on or near them, or that are subject to leasing.

As more and more Americans live closer to oil and gas wells, what lending institutions are most worried about are the additional risks brought by drilling:

  • Uninsurable property damage for oil and gas activities outside of a landowner’s control.
  • Lending institutions refusing to provide mortgage loans on homes with gas leases because they don’t meet secondary mortgage market guidelines.
  • The possibility of default because a borrower signed a mineral lease
  • Prohibitively expensive appraisals and title searches made complicated by the long paper trail associated with mineral rights and attached liabilities.
  • Difficulty of getting construction loans, which require a risk-free property.
It makes sense for local communities to establish rules like setbacks from residences. Photo: Spencer Platt, Getty Images

Photo: Spencer Platt, Getty Images

While some lending institutions continue to make loans in oilfields, the number of banks that are applying stringent conditions or refusing to make loans to properties associated with oil and gas drilling is increasing. Here are some examples:

  • In North Carolina the State Employees’ Credit Union (NCSECU) has announced that it will no longer approve mortgage financing for split estates. The credit union, which manages almost $12 billion in residential mortgages, said it considers loans on such land to be riskier than those where the mineral rights remain with the land. “You could end up where someone puts a drilling platform on a property,” says NCSECU President Jim Blaine, “We’d have to tell their neighbors, ‘we’re sorry, your property value just went down.'”
  • According to American Banker, at least two mortgage lending institutions in addition to NCSECU — Tompkins Financial in Ithaca, NY and Spain’s Santander Bank — will no longer write mortgages on land where oil or gas rights have been sold to an energy company.
  • Language in the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation’s (Freddie Mac) standard mortgage contract prohibits a “borrower from taking any action that could cause the deterioration, damage or decrease in value of the subject property.” If a landowner breaks that clause by signing a drilling lease or entering into a mineral rights agreement, Freddie Mac has the legal authority to exercise a call on the full amount of a mortgage, according to an agency spokesman.
  • According to a white paper prepared for the New York State Bar Association, Wells Fargo, one of the largest home mortgage lenders in the United States, is approaching home loans for properties that have gas drilling leases attached to them with a high degree of caution.
  • The Tompkins Trust Company has prepared a white paper that details how several companies, including Provident Funding, GMAC, FNCB, Fidelity and First Liberty, First Place Bank, Solvay Bank, and CFCU Community Credit Union, are putting hard-to-meet conditions on mortgages or denying loans altogether on properties with oil and gas leases.
  • Fracking and associated injection wells can lead to earthquakes that can damage property, a concern for a number of lenders.
  • A Pennsylvania couple was recently denied a new mortgage on their farm by Quicken Loans because of a drilling site across the street. According to the lender, “gas wells and other structures in nearby lots…can significantly degrade a property’s value” and do not meet underwriting guidelines. Two other lenders also denied the family mortgages.
  • Federal lending and mortgage institutions (FHA, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac) all have prohibitions against lending on properties where drilling is taking place or where hazardous materials are stored. A drilling lease on a property financed through one of these agencies would result in a ”technical default.” FHA’s guidelines also don’t allow it to finance mortgages where homes are within 300 feet of an active or planned drilling site.

As we’ve seen over and over, increased oil and gas drilling causes irreparable damage to a community. Lending institutions are reacting because it’s their money that’s on the line. Their increasing unwillingness to lend will further hurt property values and drive up mortgage rates.

Another industry that will shy away from increased risk is insurance. Tomorrow we’ll look at how major insurers are writing fewer policies in areas impacted by drilling.



About davidjkatz

The Moses family has lived on the Stillwater River since 1974, when George and Lucile Moses retired and moved to the Beehive from the Twin Cities. They’re gone now, but their four daughters (pictured at left, on the Beehive) and their families continue to spend time there, and have grown to love the area. This blog started as an email chain to keep the family informed about the threat of increased fracking activity in the area, but the desire to inform and get involved led to the creation of this blog.
This entry was posted in Fracking Information and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

15 Responses to Mortgage lenders increasingly worried about fracking

  1. Pingback: The deck is stacked against property owners who seek compensation for damages done by oil and gas drilling | Preserve the Beartooth Front

  2. Pingback: Lending and fracking don’t mix. | She Sold My Home

  3. What is the address of this photo? Was it photo shopped by chance?

    • davidjkatz says:

      It’s a photo I pulled off the Internet to break up copy. If it was photoshopped it certainly wasn’t by me. You’re the second person who’s questioned the authenticity of the photo, so unless I can verify it I’ll exchange it for another. The photo is not central to the argument of the post.

      • SG says:

        I found online, because of a pro-gas person’s reaction to -my- use of the photo, that it’s of NY Gov. Cuomo’s mansion, with “gas junk” photoshopped in, used as a ploy in the campaign to get him to ban fracking. (I won’t use it now, because I see every “hook” someone has to take exception to what I say as working against the effort to educate people about all this.)

      • davidjkatz says:

        Thanks. I will remove the photo. We want to inform, not propagandize.

  4. Pingback: Mortgage lenders increasingly worried about fracking | Preserve the … | Easy Loan

  5. Pingback: Mortgage lenders increasingly worried about fracking | Preserve the … | Loan Tips

  6. Pingback: Bad news. Your property value is about to go down 22% | Preserve the Beartooth Front

  7. Pingback: CIS – GAS AGENDAS on the ABC islands where we need to bring more Awareness of the problems and Issues ahead. | ronaldwederfoort

  8. Pingback: Citizen initiated zoning: a way to restore fairness to oil and gas drilling in Montana | Preserve the Beartooth Front

  9. Pingback: Meeting today in Red Lodge! Frequently Asked Questions about the Silvertip citizen-initiated zone | Preserve the Beartooth Front

  10. Pingback: Oil and gas: 10 lessons for 2015 | Preserve the Beartooth Front

  11. Pingback: Milestone: Preserve the Beartooth Front passes 100,000 hits | Preserve the Beartooth Front

  12. Pingback: Oil and gas: 10 lessons for 2015, for Montana, ND, OK, TX, OH, PA & WV

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s